On Thu, 22 Jun 2006, Greg KH wrote: > > In my upcoming patch set this test isn't needed at all, because suspending > > a device automatically suspends all of its interfaces first. I've already > > submitted the first few revised patches in that set (not the part that > > removes the test, though), but you've probably been too busy to look at > > them yet. > > I've glanced at them (and yes, been busy, they are still in my TO-APPLY > queue, trying to sync up with Linus first), but I don't see anything in > that set that changes the suspend logic. > > Or am I just missing something obvious? Which patch does that in your > revised series? It's not in any of the pieces you've gotten so far. It's about 3 patches farther down the line. Alan Stern
