[linux-pm] [PATCH 2/2] Fix console handling during suspend/resume

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Thu, 22 Jun 2006, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> 
> Linus, You are contradicting yourself a bit I think... On one mailed,
> you agreed that suspend() would happen in a "live" systems with no
> quiescing of subsystems and now you say drivers shouldn't bother

Right.

SUSPEND.

Not SNAPSHOT.

The real STR shouldn't actually need to quiesce anything.

But STD isn't suspend. And it damn well needs to quiesce things.

As long as you think of STD as suspend, you're never going to get 
_anywhere_. It's not. It has never been. And it never will be.

		Linus


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ACPI]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [CPU Freq]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux