Hi! > And yes, I admit (and I started off talking about this) that I care a lot > more about suspend-to-ram than I do about suspend-to-disk. I seriously > claim that STR _should_ be a lot simpler than suspend-to-disk, because it > avoids all the memory management problems. The reason that we support > suspend-to-disk but not STR is totally perverse - it's simply that it has > been easier to debug, because unlike STR, we can do a "real boot" into a > working system, and thus we don't have the debugging problems that the > "easy" suspend/resume case has. This is one reason, there are two more. > Which is obviously also why patch 1/2 (and in many way the more > fundamental one) was about trying to make debugging much simpler. Or at > least possible. Yes, 1/2 is pretty clever hack that can't hurt. Debugging s2ram will still be bad, but probably no longer a nightmare. Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
