On Út 02-05-06 11:07:36, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Mon, 2006-05-01 at 15:31 -0700, David Brownell wrote: > > > You mean, exactly like the valid_state() function already does?? > > Which actually opens up another question. Why is the default 1 instead > of 0? If an arch doesn't have any callbacks, why announce that it can do > it? It would seem more sensible to me to force an arch that wants to > support this to also have a valid call in order to announce it. Not that > it actually will work, but why even show it? Historical reasons. Pavel -- Thanks for all the (sleeping) penguins.
