On Po 20-02-06 15:30:16, Alan Stern wrote: > On Mon, 20 Feb 2006, Patrick Mochel wrote: > > > > And if the computer can wake up in response to USB events, then obviously > > > the USB controller _is_ receiving some power. > > > > True, and I apologize if I misunderstood your initial question. By "up", I > > thought you meant fully powered and functional. > > No; in the context of this thread I merely meant suspend-power was > present. Pavel had said that a machine which supplies any USB power at > all during swsusp is broken. I was trying to show this isn't so. I take that back. I still claim it is unusal ;-). Pavel -- Web maintainer for suspend.sf.net (www.sf.net/projects/suspend) wanted...