[linux-pm] Re: [RFC][PATCH] swsusp: warn about USB devices in documentation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 20 Feb 2006, Patrick Mochel wrote:

> > > > Does swsusp still support these not-completely-powered-off modes?
> > >
> > > Yes. echo platform > /sys/power/disk.
> >
> > So if you did that, you could suspend-to-disk while leaving USB up, right?
> > Without anything being wrong with the machine.
> 
> No, not likely. S4 is +/- equivalent to a "soft off", except that it
> responds to more wake-up events than a soft off will (which BTW is defined
> as "S5").

Does it respond to USB wakeup events (like plugging in a new device)?

> Even S3 will power down all of the PCI buses, including the USB host
> controllers. The chances of having any low-power system state that will
> still power the USB ports (by design) is pretty slim.

Here is a counterexample from Kyle Moffet 
(<http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=113980955219914&w=2>):

	Let me bring up the example of my PowerBook again.  It's RAM is
	fully powered right now, running from battery, and it has another
	couple days of sleep- charge left before I have to worry about
	plugging it in again.  When I open it, the firmware automatically
	powers up the CPU and other hardware and returns control to the
	OS.  I can _also_ trigger it to wake by leaving it closed and
	connecting an external VGA and USB (it wakes every time I connect
	a USB, but my suspend script puts it to sleep again if it's closed
	and has no external VGA).

There's a difference between powering-down and turning off completely.  
The USB suspend-power-budget per attached port is 500 uA at 5 V, which
amounts to 2.5 mW.  While that's more than you need to keep RAM alive,
it's not a tremendous amount.  And most devices probably use less power
when suspended than this maximum.

The EHCI specification includes a lot of very careful language about which
portions of the controller should be attached to which power well.  It's
quite clear that most of the controller's circuitry can be turned off
while still supplying enough suspend power to keep the bus alive and
enable wakeup events.

And if the computer can wake up in response to USB events, then obviously
the USB controller _is_ receiving some power.

Alan Stern


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ACPI]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [CPU Freq]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux