On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 03:59:25PM -0800, Patrick Mochel wrote: > > On Sat, 18 Feb 2006, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > Hi! > > > > > Fix the per-device state file to respect the actual state that > > > is reported by the device, or written to the file. > > > > Can we let "state" file die? You actually suggested that at one point. > > > > I do not think passing states in u32 is good idea. New interface that passes > > state as string would probably be better. > > Yup, in the future that will be better. For now, let's work with what we > got and fix 2.6.16 to be compatible with previous versions.. It's _way_ too late in the 2.6.16 cycle for this series of patches, if that is what you are proposing. thanks, greg k-h
