[linux-pm] Re: [PATCH, RFC] [1/3] Generic in-kernel AC status

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi!

> >This is not true as far as my box is concerned 
> >(Asus L5D).  It starts with
> >the _highest_ clock available.
> Hmm, but then there shouldn't be any critical 
> overheat problems and if,
> the hardware has to switch off the machine 
> hard. OS always could freeze,
> but the battery must not start to burn...

I told that to hw designers... too late. Fortunately batteries usually
only crash machine if you overload them.

> IMO, the /sys/.../brightness patch should go in 
> as soon as possible, I think
> all everybody agrees here?

Yep.

> Maybe I oversaw an issue, but I really don't 
> see a reason for connecting
> the brightness to ac in kernel space.

We are not going to connect it. But to implement .../brightness, you need to
know ac/battery on several "broken" notebooks.

-- 
64 bytes from 195.113.31.123: icmp_seq=28 ttl=51 time=448769.1 ms         


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ACPI]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [CPU Freq]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux