On Wednesday 08 February 2006 06:40, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > On Tuesday 07 February 2006 04:06, Nigel Cunningham wrote: > > Hi all. > > > > This patch is designed to help with diagnosing and fixing the cause of > > problems in suspending/resuming, due to drivers wrongly re-enabling > > interrupts in their .suspend or .resume methods. > > > > I nearly forgot about it in sending patches in suspend2 that might help > > where swsusp fails. > > > > Only sysdevs are guaranteed to be suspebded/resumed with interrupts off, > other devices are suspended with interrupts on (at least on first pass > over device list). Yes, and AFAICT this is how it's supposed to be. [There was an LKML thread last year that finished with this conclusion. I think I can find it for reference, if necessary.] Greetings, Rafael
