OK - sorry, my misparsing of what you asked. I agree that wakeup would always be caused by some single device, not by multiple devices. scott | From mochel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Thu Jan 5 18:04:42 2006 | Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2006 16:02:29 -0800 (PST) | From: Patrick Mochel<mochel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> | cc: Pavel Machek<pavel@xxxxxx>, Alan Stern<stern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, | | | On Thu, 5 Jan 2006, Preece Scott-PREECE wrote: | | > This is, of course, in an embedded framework rather than a desktop | > framework - we suspend and wakeup automatically, not via user | > intervention. Answering a question asked in another piece of mail, we | > have roughly a dozen different devices that cause the system to wakeup - | > keypad press, touchscreen touch, flip open/close, etc. | | Hmm, it would be nice if that comment was in reply to the email in which | it came. At least if it was in the same thread.. | | Many systems have > 1 _possible_ wakeup devices (keyboard, touchscreen, | lid, etc). You implied that when a system wakes up, there could be > 1 | device that actually woke the system up, which is in direct conflict with | what I've always assumed - that when a system wakes up, it is caused by a | single device (and if there were multiple events, like a key press *and* a | mouse movement, it's doesn't really matter).. | | Thanks, | | | Patrick | | -- scott preece motorola mobile devices, il67, 1800 s. oak st., champaign, il 61820 e-mail: preece@xxxxxxxxxxxx fax: +1-217-384-8550 phone: +1-217-384-8589 cell: +1-217-433-6114 pager: 2174336114@xxxxxxxxx
