On Thu, 5 Jan 2006, Preece Scott-PREECE wrote: > This is, of course, in an embedded framework rather than a desktop > framework - we suspend and wakeup automatically, not via user > intervention. Answering a question asked in another piece of mail, we > have roughly a dozen different devices that cause the system to wakeup - > keypad press, touchscreen touch, flip open/close, etc. Hmm, it would be nice if that comment was in reply to the email in which it came. At least if it was in the same thread.. Many systems have > 1 _possible_ wakeup devices (keyboard, touchscreen, lid, etc). You implied that when a system wakes up, there could be > 1 device that actually woke the system up, which is in direct conflict with what I've always assumed - that when a system wakes up, it is caused by a single device (and if there were multiple events, like a key press *and* a mouse movement, it's doesn't really matter).. Thanks, Patrick
