[linux-pm] [RFC] change suspend_finish order slightly

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi.

On Sat, 2005-12-03 at 13:15, Shaohua Li wrote:
> The BIOS guys here require ACPI _WAK method which is called in
> pm_ops->finish is invoked after all CPUs are resumed. Detail info can be
> found at http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5651. To do this,
> this patch tries to change the order slightly. Does this break other
> platforms?

Is it needed even if you call the prepare after hot unplugging other
cpus? (If so, I need to modify suspend2, too).

Regards,

Nigel

> Thanks,
> Shaohua
> ---
> 
>  linux-2.6.14-root/kernel/power/main.c |    4 ++--
>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff -puN kernel/power/main.c~smp_s3_order kernel/power/main.c
> --- linux-2.6.14/kernel/power/main.c~smp_s3_order	2005-11-03 14:18:29.000000000 +0800
> +++ linux-2.6.14-root/kernel/power/main.c	2005-11-03 14:21:05.000000000 +0800
> @@ -133,10 +133,10 @@ static int suspend_enter(suspend_state_t
>  static void suspend_finish(suspend_state_t state)
>  {
>  	device_resume();
> -	if (pm_ops && pm_ops->finish)
> -		pm_ops->finish(state);
>  	thaw_processes();
>  	enable_nonboot_cpus();
> +	if (pm_ops && pm_ops->finish)
> +		pm_ops->finish(state);
>  	pm_restore_console();
>  }
>  
> _
> 
> 
> 
> ______________________________________________________________________
> _______________________________________________
> linux-pm mailing list
> linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
-- 



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ACPI]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [CPU Freq]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux