On St 23-11-05 11:16:27, Lorenzo Colitti wrote: > Pavel Machek wrote: > >Yes, hopefully users will not notice. > > ? So the idea is to merge inferior code and "hope users won't notice"? > > Users might not notice that half their memory is gone, but they *will* > notice that their system is dog slow when it resumes because all their > caches are gone and a most of their stuff is swapped out. > > Non-responsive system on resume is one of the main reasons that swsusp2 > is much better than swsusp1, and yes, users *do* notice (I was one of > them, as I pointed out a while back). Yes, 50% is better than nothing, > but it's still a pretty poor show. Did you actually benchmark it? > Seen from the perspective of a user, the situation is simple: suspend2 > works, it's fast, and it's rock-solid. Just use it. About as helpful as "Windows XP works, it's fast, and it's rock-solid". Pavel -- Thanks, Sharp!
