[linux-pm] [RFC] userland swsusp

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi!

> > > I've also split the one patch that most people see into what is
> > > currently about 225 smaller patches, each adding only one small part, am
> > > writing descriptions for them all and am preparing to build a git tree
> > > from it.
> > 
> > I'm not sure that gets suspend2 any closer to merging. 225 small
> > patches is still awful lot of code :-(. Now... if something can be
> > done in userspace, it probably should. And I'm trying to show that
> > suspend2 functionality can indeed be done in userspace.
> > 
> > So... to get 225 patches in, you'll need to explain that
> > userland-swsusp can't work. If you can do that, please be nice and do
> > it soon, so that I don't waste too much time on userland-swsusp.
> 
> I thought Dave already did that.

No, I do not think so. He did not like the user<->kernel interface;
but that can be changed (and Rafael has plans to do that). I think we
can present nicer interface to userland without much code. Or maybe
not; but we can certainly limit /dev/kmem for suspend only -- and that
should make it acceptable security-wise.

                                                                Pavel

-- 
Thanks, Sharp!

[Index of Archives]     [Linux ACPI]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [CPU Freq]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux