[linux-pm] Re: [RFC/RFT][PATCH 0/2] swsusp: improve freeing of memory

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi!

> The following two patches are designed to make swsusp free only as much
> memory as needed for suspend and not as much as possible.  This speeds
> up the suspend and resume significantly and causes the system to be much
> more responsive after resume.

Yep, users will love you :-). But you need to let them know, and that
probably means cc: on linux-kernel.

If you want someone to test crypto swsusp, ask ast@xxxxxxxxx But
removing that option is okay, too.

I still miss those "a"s in "swap".

+
+unsigned int snapshot_nr_pages(void)
+{
+       return nr_copy_pages;
+}
+
+struct pbe *snapshot_pblist(void)
+{
+       return pagedir_nosave;
+}
+
+void snapshot_pblist_set(struct pbe *pblist)
+{
+       pagedir_nosave = pblist;
+}

I really hate these. pblist_set( is the worst one. [Still improvement
from previous versions, through.] Perhaps you can just access the
variables directly?

If you really want to clean this up, swsusp_save should probably be 

int swsusp_save(struct pbe **pblist, int *nr_pages)

[that should make snapshot_nr_pages and snapshot_pblist obsolete,
right?] 

Getting rid of snapshot_pblist_set may require a bit more surgery, but
should be doable, too. swsusp_resume() should probably get struct pbe *argument...

								Pavel
-- 
Thanks, Sharp!

[Index of Archives]     [Linux ACPI]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [CPU Freq]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux