Hi,
On Wednesday, 19 of October 2005 18:18, Alan Stern wrote:
> [Trimmed the CC: list]
}-- snip --{
> > > > Stopping tasks: ========================|
> > > > Freeing memory... done (14642 pages freed)
> > > > Suspending device card0-0
> > > > Suspending device 2-2:1.0
> > > > Suspending device 2-2
> > > > Suspending device 3-0:1.0
> > > > hub 3-0:1.0: no suspend?
>
> This line is the puzzle. It indicates that the driver bound to the
> 3-0:1.0 device (which is a root hub interface for one of your USB
> controllers) doesn't have a suspend or resume method. But the hub driver
> _does_ have these methods!
Unless someone, like me, has CONFIG_USB_SUSPEND unset,
in which case they are #defined as NULLs (of course if I'm not missing
anything). Is now CONFIG_USB_SUSPEND mandatory for being able to suspend?
> Unless you somehow screwed up the build. Take a look inside
> drivers/usb/core/hub.c and make sure that the hub_suspend() and
> hub_resume() routines are listed in the hub_driver table, and that they
> haven't been preprocessed away into NULLs. You might end up needing to do
> a clean rebuild.
This already is a clean build, on top of 2.6.13 unpacked from scratch (well,
I have some patches applied, but they don't touch USB).
> > > > Suspending device usb3
> > > > Could not suspend device usb3: error -16
> > > > Some devices failed to suspend
>
> These errors occurred, naturally enough, because the driver for usb3
> refused to suspend since one of the children -- namely 3-0:1.0 -- wasn't
> suspended.
I've figured out that too. However, if something has no _suspend() routine,
verify_suspended() could return 0 for it, I think, instead of -EBUSY.
Greetings,
Rafael
