[linux-pm] [PATCH] Threads shouldn't inherit PF_NOFREEZE

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The PF_NOFREEZE process flag should not be inherited when a thread is 
forked.  This patch (as585) removes the flag from the child.

This problem is starting to show up more and more as drivers turn to the
kthread API instead of using kernel_thread().  As a result, their kernel
threads are now children of the kthread worker instead of modprobe, and
they inherit the PF_NOFREEZE flag.  This can cause problems during system
suspend; the kernel threads are not getting frozen as they ought to be.

Alan Stern



Signed-off-by: Alan Stern <stern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

---

What I said above may not be quite true.  For all I know, there may be
threads which rely on inheriting PF_NOFREEZE from their parent.  But it
should not be inherited by default.

Index: usb-2.6/kernel/fork.c
===================================================================
--- usb-2.6.orig/kernel/fork.c
+++ usb-2.6/kernel/fork.c
@@ -848,7 +848,7 @@ static inline void copy_flags(unsigned l
 {
 	unsigned long new_flags = p->flags;
 
-	new_flags &= ~PF_SUPERPRIV;
+	new_flags &= ~(PF_SUPERPRIV | PF_NOFREEZE);
 	new_flags |= PF_FORKNOEXEC;
 	if (!(clone_flags & CLONE_PTRACE))
 		p->ptrace = 0;


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ACPI]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [CPU Freq]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux