On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 10:55:16AM -0700, Todd Poynor wrote: > cc'ing linux-pm list. And thereby breaking the etiquette, thanks. For folks on linux-pm, please drop the linux-arm-kernel cc: > A cell phone maker has expressed interest in > approximately the same thing, in their case to barely wake from suspend, > update the time and other display info, check to see if they need to > fully resume, and if not go back to suspend. > > A new optional pm_ops wakeup hook, called after the enter_state callback > returns, that can veto resume and go back to call enter_state for the > previous state should work, yes? This hook would be intended for > system-specific customization (should always be NULL in generic board > support), and would avoid global access to pm_ops and the fragile > process of inserting new routines into the suspend/resume callback > paths. I can float a patch for that if that sounds suitable. Thanks -- > Todd FYI I don't like the patch below - it makes working out what's going on rather problematical. Override the registered pm_ops completely instead. Don't fiddle with structures you don't own (thereby breaking the modularity of the code) by making them global.
