[linux-pm] Re: Runtime PM support for named power states

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> Thank you.  It's a start, anyway.  My real question is: Is this the right 
> way to go?

My two cents are that its definately a thrust in the right direction.  The
important thing is that it makes the devices start thinking about how to
transition between power states outside of a system level event.  This is
mandatory infrastructure, regardless of the higher level policy management 
(or lack thereof) that we eventually agree upon.

Jordan

-- 
Jordan Crouse
Senior Linux Engineer
AMD - Personal Connectivity Solutions Group
<www.amd.com/embeddedprocessors>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ACPI]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [CPU Freq]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux