[linux-pm] Problems with PM_FREEZE

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi!

> > IMO if the driver is a module it should not make any assumptions
> > on the state of the device when its resume routine is called.  Instead,
> > it should assume the device can be in an arbitrary state and proceed
> > in the safest way possible.  Which is 3.
> 
> That's what it should do when resuming from disk.
> 
> But that's not what it should do when it's being resumed just after the
> memory image was created, in order to write out the image.  In this case
> the device is known to be in FREEZE, not SUSPEND, and to save time we
> would like the driver not to go through a full resume procedure.

Do you have any driver which can save some significant ammount of time
that way?
								Pavel
-- 
if you have sharp zaurus hardware you don't need... you know my address

[Index of Archives]     [Linux ACPI]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [CPU Freq]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux