> If these general ideas of arbitrary platform power parameters and > operating points are deemed worthy of continued consideration, I'll > propose what I view is the next step: interfaces to create and activate > operating points from userspace. > > At that point it should be possible to write power policy management > applications for systems that can benefit from this generalized notion > of operating points: create the operating points that match the system > usage models (in the case of many embedded systems, the system is some > mode with different power/performance characteristics such as audio > playback vs. mobile phone call in progress) and power needs (e.g., low > battery strength vs. high strength) and activate operating points based > on events received (new app running, low battery warning, etc.). > > Any opinions on all that? Thanks, > > -- > Todd Hi, I'd like to have an idea of how the powerop would evolve to address: a) exporting all operating points to sysfs - that would be useful for a policy manager in user space, or the user policy will already be aware of the ops? b) Constraints: if I would like to change to a op and such a transition is not allowed in hardware, what part of the software will test it? The set/get powerop functions, the higher layers or even some lower layer (don't know if expected) ? thanks, Daniel -- 10LE - Linux INdT - Manaus - Brazil