[linux-pm] Re: FYI: device_suspend(...) in kernel_power_off().

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi!

> There as been a fair amount of consensus that calling
> device_suspend(...) in the reboot path was inappropriate now, because
> the device suspend code was too immature.   With this latest
> piece of evidence it seems to me that introducing device_suspend(...)
> in kernel_power_off, kernel_halt, kernel_reboot, or kernel_kexec
> can never be appropriate.

Code is not ready now => it can never be fixed? Thats quite a strange
conclusion to make.
				Pavel
-- 
64 bytes from 195.113.31.123: icmp_seq=28 ttl=51 time=448769.1 ms         


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ACPI]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [CPU Freq]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux