Pavel Machek wrote: > Anyway, it should not be arch-dependend. We need one good mechanism of > notifying userland, not one per architecture. Yes. >> Sure, ideally. However, existing X knows how to deal with APM events, >> and thus APM emulation is an important thing to get something that >> works. Pne thing I should do is consolidate PPC APM emu with ARM one as >> I think Russell improve my stuff significantly. > > Perhaps we need apm emulation on i386, too? No. This is too ugly for words IMO. If we have one good mechanism of notifying userland, X can use this mechanism. Let's kill APM, not keep it alive. -- Stefan Seyfried QA / R&D Team Mobile Devices | "Any ideas, John?" SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Nürnberg | "Well, surrounding them's out."
