I volunteer to be an additional test victim if needed. Jordan On Thu, 19 May 2005 15:45:50 -0700 "David Brownell" <david-b@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thursday 19 May 2005 9:38 am, Jordan Crouse wrote: > > > This is a refresh of a patch I sent before. I suspect it'd be > > > appropriate to merge this, given the agreement I thought I > > > heard last time I posted it. > > > > Maybe I haven't been paying attention (likely), but I don't see that > > there has been any official activity on this patch. Is it headed > > to the -mm branch or headed to the bit bucket? > > Nobody really commented on it this time. But then, not many folk > are actually looking at wakeup support lately ... there's so much > attention on the "power down my laptop with swsusp" case that the > other PM scenarios -- "real PM" vs "off" -- often get ignored. > > I'll see about only putting that "wakeup" attribute on devices > that actually need it, and then submit that. With infrastructure > in place, folk can start using it. > > - Dave > >
