On Sat, 2005-04-16 at 10:13 -0700, David Brownell wrote: > On Friday 15 April 2005 6:16 am, Daniel Petrini wrote: > > > > Suggestion: as discussed in early weeks, why don't adopt names taking into > > consideration that Linux can run in systems other than desktops and servers? > > > > #define PM_SYSTEM_STATE_SUSPEND_RAM 0x00000010 > > #define PM_SYSTEM_STATE_SUSPEND_DISK 0x00000020 > > The notion of RAM doesn't bother me much, although it may matter > whether that means "all system RAM is preserved" versus "only a > small bit of on-chip SDRAM is preserved". > > The notion of DISK bothers me more. Systems with only FLASH/MTD > probably aren't more demanding of PM infrastructure, but when > folk assume that the only non-volatile storage is a disk, it may > start to seem that way. > > For the moment, maybe using "NONVOLATILE" rather than DISK would > be good. Also, somewhat of a nit, those aren't exactly states, > so maybe take at least the _STATE_ thingie out. > > - Dave Yeah, I agree. I've changed this. Thanks, Adam
