On Wed, 6 Apr 2005, Nigel Cunningham wrote: > I don't think Rafael is suggesting ignoring them. He's suggesting what > I'm already doing: > - Signal so they enter the freezer if they leave the state; > - Don't count them when deciding whether freezing failed; > - Handle the case where they don't leave the state until post resume (I > let them enter the refrigerator, but have code in there to check whether > the freezer is still on). > > In this way, I handle kseriod and anything else uninterruptible without > any problems. What happens if a process owns a lock needed to suspend a device and it is waiting in TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE? Alan Stern
