On Tuesday, 5 of April 2005 20:17, Alan Stern wrote: > On Tue, 5 Apr 2005, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > 1) We can treat uninterruptible tasks as non-freezable (in analogy to stopped > > tasks) - if all of the other tasks are frozen, nothing can wake up an uninterruptible > > task, so this seems to be a safe approach. > > Not true at all. An uninterruptible task can be woken up by an interrupt > handler. Right. So it seems we'll have to force uninterruptible tasks to go to the refrigerator(). Greets, Rafael -- - Would you tell me, please, which way I ought to go from here? - That depends a good deal on where you want to get to. -- Lewis Carroll "Alice's Adventures in Wonderland"
