Hi! > > I have two questions regarding freeze_processes(): > > 1) Shouldn't we take the TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE state into consideration? Now > we will fail if a process is sleeping when we try to freeze it. We can't allow processes to sleep at arbitrary places. Therefore we send UNINTERRUPTIBLE task a signal, and hope it can get into refrigerator in time. > 2) Is it necessary to check p->state == TASK_STOPPED and > p->state == TASK_TRACED twice in a row (once in freezable() and > then again in the next if ())? Those tests should probably be killed from if() below. As far as I can see, they can not trigger there. Pavel -- People were complaining that M$ turns users into beta-testers... ...jr ghea gurz vagb qrirybcref, naq gurl frrz gb yvxr vg gung jnl!
