On Tuesday 22 March 2005 4:52 pm, Patrick Mochel wrote: > > > I think the core should always call ->suspend() for a device, regardless > of whether it thinks it's in a low power state, or inactive. This is > specifically for the reason that a device could be a low-power runtime > state when the system is suspended. I don't quite see a need for this. If the parent/bridge driver knows the device is adequately suspended, why kick it again? It's actually rather annoying -- and error/bug prone! -- to have to code drivers to detect and cope with superfluous suspend calls. - Dave
