Hi! > > > This is sort-of breaking the rule of "no DMA", and thus is not suitable > > > for kexec (which is ok, kexec currently uses the separate "shutdown" > > > callback which must switch DMA off), but would fix the problem for > > > suspend to disk... > > > > What problem? suspend seems to +/- work with suspend-to-disk just > > now. I'd really hate to have to think about "some memory may change > > behind my back" during suspend. I think "no DMA" is a good rule. > > Well, it's not that simple. It may work for you and not for others, and > it will definitely introduce complications with the current scheme since > it seems we +/- have to suspend USB busses (and possibly disconnect some > devices) at freeze time... Okay, I see that can be slow. Is there any other problem? ...and I probably would not want to suspend to my external usb2 disk... Ok, that might be small problem. Pavel -- People were complaining that M$ turns users into beta-testers... ...jr ghea gurz vagb qrirybcref, naq gurl frrz gb yvxr vg gung jnl!
