On Wednesday 16 March 2005 7:45 am, Alan Stern wrote: > On Wed, 16 Mar 2005, Bernard Blackham wrote: > > > I haven't tried David's patch yet - the only differences are it > > seems to use a slightly different order, and also calls > > pci_set_master. I'll give that a spin later today combined with and > > without yours to see what works reliably. > > The missing pci_set_master in my patch probably explains the errors you > got. > > David's patch doesn't make all the necessary changes that my patch does. > In particular it doesn't avoid doing pci_restore_state when there was no > prior pci_save_state, so it will continue to exhibit some of the problems > we were seeing before. Well, as I said it wasn't quite ready for prime time. It's possible that would explain some other USB related resume issues. I'm not sure why your patch is so big/complex t hough...
