[linux-pm] Some thoughts on suspend/resume development

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2005-03-09 at 06:00 -0800, Patrick Mochel wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Mar 2005, Adam Belay wrote:
> 
> > I agree that individual drivers should track their own usage.  I was
> > just wondering if we could provide some utility functions that would
> > help with this.
> 
> Definitely.
> 
> > I'm sorry I wasn't clear on this.  I also want the settings to be
> > per-instance, not per class.  I think that power management policy is a
> > class level issue, however.  In other words, a class could provide an
> > array of policies, and each device could individually be assigned one.
> 
> Ah, I see what you're saying. I think it is per-class, but I also think
> that it's policy that should exist in Userspace.
> 
> 
> 	Pat

The ACPI spec provides information about power management policy for
each class of device (minimum latency, suggested criteria for power
changes, etc).  It could be helpful as a general guideline.  It may make
sense to set policy in userspace, but execute it in the kernel.

Adam



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ACPI]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [CPU Freq]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux