[linux-pm] Some thoughts on suspend/resume development

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On St 09-03-05 01:34:06, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On Wednesday 09 March 2005 00:59, Adam Belay wrote:
> > 
> > I agree that individual drivers should track their own usage.  I was
> > just wondering if we could provide some utility functions that would
> > help with this.
> > 
> 
> Did we remove pm_access() and friends just a tad early?

I don't think so. It depended on other pm_register (etc) functions,
and nobody was using it, anyway.
								Pavel
-- 
People were complaining that M$ turns users into beta-testers...
...jr ghea gurz vagb qrirybcref, naq gurl frrz gb yvxr vg gung jnl!

[Index of Archives]     [Linux ACPI]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [CPU Freq]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux