[linux-pm] Preparation for a talk on 2.6 power management.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 01:48:43AM -0500, Brown, Len wrote:
> 
> ACPI-based PCI-hotplug covers non-standard hot-plug controllers,
> but when PCI standardized its hot-plug controller, ACPI isn't
> needed for hot-plug where standard HW has shipped.
> 
Bit orthogonal from the original intent of the post, but...

This is not always true. The PCI specifications do not standardize
root bridge hot-plug, so ACPI will continue to be used for that.
Also, SHPC/PCIE hot-plug depends on such a hot-plug controller
being present north of the thing being hot-plugged. I expect
we will continue to have hardware where bridges are being 
hot-plugged so far north that they won't have a standard hot-plug
controller above them. I do expect ACPI to be come obsolete for
leaf/end device hot-plug though.

> I expect the same thing to happen with CPU, memory, and IO-hotplug --
> they'll start off non-standard and abstracted by ACPI; and
> then later standard methods may emerge.
> 
CPU and memory hot-plug will likely remain ACPI based until some
standard body defines all the abstractions needed to describe
APICs, physical addresses etc. etc. I don't see any such activity
happening right now.

Rajesh


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ACPI]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [CPU Freq]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux