At Tue, 4 Jan 2005 21:22:45 +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > > Hi! > > > > What about this patch? It marks old power managemnt as obsolete (and > > > also adds some sparse-style type checking; typedefs were already there > > > so why not use them?). I think it should go in, so that we can get a > > > rid of old power managment infrastructure post-2.6.11. > > > > ALSA core part still includes pm_register/unregister() for old > > (non-PnP) ISA devices. > > > > What is the proper way to register/unregister PM hooks for such > > devices? > > How are PnP ISA devices handled? Sorry, correction: pm_register() is used for both ISA PnP and non-PnP devices. > Right solution for ISA devices is probably to create an ISA bus in > driver model, and hook such devices there.... Yep. > Alternatively, you might just hang them onto platform bus, in similar > way i8042 uses... This looks easier to implement as a temporary solution until ISA bus is implemented. We know how many instances are to be initiailized in advance, so each driver object can have a unique name. > Imagine this configuration: > > cpu -- PCI #1 -- PCI to PCI bridge -- PCI #2 -- PCI to ISA bridge -- sound card #1 on 0x100 > \- PCI to PCI bridge -- PCI #3 -- PCI to ISA bridge -- sound card #2 on 0x100 > > ...would you say that's supported? If yes you'd need to create ISA > buses and do it properly, otherwise hooking to platform bus is > probably acceptable. Well, I don't think this can be problematic on ISA soundcards with platform_device. Anyway, I'll try to implement platform_device at first as a test... Thanks! Takashi