[linux-pm] Implementing the new PM model

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 7 Nov 2004, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:

> On Sat, 2004-11-06 at 17:16 -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
> > On Sun, 7 Nov 2004, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > 
> > > Ok. On a totally separate issue, aren't there some kind of unique IDs or
> > > serial number on mass storage to avoid just that ? I know ieee1394 does,
> > > though I don't think linux can deal with that properly (MacOS can
> > > afaik).
> > 
> > Sometimes there are, and the 2.4 version of usb-storage attempts to use
> > them to keep track of devices when they are disconnected and reconnected.  
> > During the 2.5 development cycle Linus came down hard and said this was
> > absolutely the wrong thing to do.  Ever since then usb-storage ignores
> > UIDs and serial numbers.  Of course, the higher layers are still free to
> > use things like filesystem labels...
> 
> But that means unmounting/remounting... and possible data loss ... I
> think MacOS can shout at you when you disconnect a mounted device and
> lets you put it back without data loss, but then, that was old MacOS, I
> don't know if OSX can do the same.
> 
> Anyway, this is unrelated and won't change anytime soon.

Yep.  Not until Linus changes his mind...

Alan Stern



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ACPI]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [CPU Freq]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux