Andy, May I ask which line of the Oops is " you randomly did something " ? and should be removed ? Thanks, Ethan -----Original Message----- From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> Sent: Sunday, September 27, 2020 5:10 PM To: Zhao, Haifeng <haifeng.zhao@xxxxxxxxx>; Hansen, Dave <dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxx> Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx>; Oliver <oohall@xxxxxxxxx>; ruscur@xxxxxxxxxx; Lukas Wunner <lukas@xxxxxxxxx>; Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Stuart Hayes <stuart.w.hayes@xxxxxxxxx>; Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@xxxxxxxxx>; Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; linux-pci <linux-pci@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Jia, Pei P <pei.p.jia@xxxxxxxxx>; ashok.raj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@xxxxxxxxx>; Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5 V4] PCI: pciehp: check and wait port status out of DPC before handling DLLSC and PDC On Sun, Sep 27, 2020 at 11:31 AM Ethan Zhao <haifeng.zhao@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > When root port has DPC capability and it is enabled, then triggered by > errors, DPC DLLSC and PDC interrupts will be sent to DPC driver, > pciehp driver at the same time. > That will cause following result: > > 1. Link and device are recovered by hardware DPC and software DPC driver, > device > isn't removed, but the pciehp might treat it as device was hot removed. > > 2. Race condition happens bettween pciehp_unconfigure_device() called by > pciehp_ist() in pciehp driver and pci_do_recovery() called by > dpc_handler in DPC driver. no luck, there is no lock to protect > pci_stop_and_remove_bus_device() > against pci_walk_bus(), they hold different samphore and mutex, > pci_stop_and_remove_bus_device holds pci_rescan_remove_lock, and > pci_walk_bus() holds pci_bus_sem. > > This race condition is not purely code analysis, it could be triggered > by following command series: > > # setpci -s 64:02.0 0x196.w=000a // 64:02.0 rootport has DPC capability > # setpci -s 65:00.0 0x04.w=0544 // 65:00.0 NVMe SSD populated in port > # mount /dev/nvme0n1p1 nvme > > One shot will cause system panic and NULL pointer reference happened. > (tested on stable 5.8 & ICS(Ice Lake SP platform, see > https://en.wikichip.org/wiki/intel/microarchitectures/ice_lake_(server > )) > > Buffer I/O error on dev nvme0n1p1, logical block 3328, async page read > BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000050 > #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode > #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page > PGD 0 Seems like you randomly did something about the series and would like it to be applied?! It's no go! Please, read my comments again v1 one more time and carefully comment or address. Why do you still have these (some above, some below this comment) non-relevant lines of oops? > Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP NOPTI > CPU: 12 PID: 513 Comm: irq/124-pcie-dp Not tainted 5.8.0 el8.x86_64+ #1 > RIP: 0010:report_error_detected.cold.4+0x7d/0xe6 > Code: b6 d0 e8 e8 fe 11 00 e8 16 c5 fb ff be 06 00 00 00 48 89 df e8 d3 > 65 ff ff b8 06 00 00 00 e9 75 fc ff ff 48 8b 43 68 45 31 c9 <48> 8b 50 > 50 48 83 3a 00 41 0f 94 c1 45 31 c0 48 85 d2 41 0f 94 c0 > RSP: 0018:ff8e06cf8762fda8 EFLAGS: 00010246 > RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ff4e3eaacf42a000 RCX: ff4e3eb31f223c01 > RDX: ff4e3eaacf42a140 RSI: ff4e3eb31f223c00 RDI: ff4e3eaacf42a138 > RBP: ff8e06cf8762fdd0 R08: 00000000000000bf R09: 0000000000000000 > R10: 000000eb8ebeab53 R11: ffffffff93453258 R12: 0000000000000002 > R13: ff4e3eaacf42a130 R14: ff8e06cf8762fe2c R15: ff4e3eab44733828 > FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ff4e3eab1fd00000(0000) knl > GS:0000000000000000 > CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 > CR2: 0000000000000050 CR3: 0000000f8f80a004 CR4: 0000000000761ee0 > DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 > DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 > PKRU: 55555554 > Call Trace: > ? report_normal_detected+0x20/0x20 > report_frozen_detected+0x16/0x20 > pci_walk_bus+0x75/0x90 > ? dpc_irq+0x90/0x90 > pcie_do_recovery+0x157/0x201 > ? irq_finalize_oneshot.part.47+0xe0/0xe0 > dpc_handler+0x29/0x40 > irq_thread_fn+0x24/0x60 > irq_thread+0xea/0x170 > ? irq_forced_thread_fn+0x80/0x80 > ? irq_thread_check_affinity+0xf0/0xf0 > kthread+0x124/0x140 > ? kthread_park+0x90/0x90 > ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 > Modules linked in: nft_fib_inet......... > CR2: 0000000000000050 > Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> And no, this is not how the tags are being applied. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
