On 9/26/2020 11:28 PM, Ethan Zhao wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c b/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c
> index 53433b37e181..6f271160f18d 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c
> @@ -710,8 +710,10 @@ static irqreturn_t pciehp_ist(int irq, void *dev_id)
> down_read(&ctrl->reset_lock);
> if (events & DISABLE_SLOT)
> pciehp_handle_disable_request(ctrl);
> - else if (events & (PCI_EXP_SLTSTA_PDC | PCI_EXP_SLTSTA_DLLSC))
> + else if (events & (PCI_EXP_SLTSTA_PDC | PCI_EXP_SLTSTA_DLLSC)) {
> + pci_wait_port_outdpc(pdev);
> pciehp_handle_presence_or_link_change(ctrl, events);
> + }
> up_read(&ctrl->reset_lock);
This looks like a hack TBH.
Lukas, Keith;
What is your take on this?
Why is device lock not protecting this situation?
Is there a lock missing in hotplug driver?
Sinan
