[PATCH v2 3/3] swiotlb: Mark max_segment with static keyword

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Sparse is not happy about max_segment declaration:

  CHECK   kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
  kernel/dma/swiotlb.c:96:14: warning: symbol 'max_segment' was not declared. Should it be static?

Mark it static as suggested.

Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
v2: no change
 kernel/dma/swiotlb.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c b/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
index 6499bda8f0b8..465a567678d9 100644
--- a/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
+++ b/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
@@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ static unsigned int io_tlb_index;
  * Max segment that we can provide which (if pages are contingous) will
  * not be bounced (unless SWIOTLB_FORCE is set).
  */
-unsigned int max_segment;
+static unsigned int max_segment;
 
 /*
  * We need to save away the original address corresponding to a mapped entry
-- 
2.28.0




[Index of Archives]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux USB]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Greybus]

  Powered by Linux