"Derrick, Jonathan" <jonathan.derrick@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> On Tue, 2020-06-30 at 11:33 -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> I see that struct irqchip_fwid contains the actual fwnode structure and
> when that is freed, it's causes the issue.
>
> I'm noticing in each caller of irq_domain_free_fwnode, we have the
> domain itself available. It seems like it should be up to the caller to
> deal with the fwnode pointer, but we could just do:
Why? The fwnode pointer handling is inconsistent for the various fwnode
types. We really don't want to go back to that state.
Thanks,
tglx
