On 7/13/20 2:13 PM, Saheed Bolarinwa wrote:
Hello Larry,
On 7/13/20 7:16 PM, Larry Finger wrote:
On 7/13/20 7:22 AM, Saheed O. Bolarinwa wrote:
In reference to the PCI spec (Chapter 2), PCIBIOS* is an x86 concept.
Their scope should be limited within arch/x86.
Change all PCIBIOS_SUCCESSFUL to 0
Signed-off-by: "Saheed O. Bolarinwa" <refactormyself@xxxxxxxxx>
Could you please tell me what difference this makes? It looks like source
churn rather than a substantive change. The symbol is defined in pci.h and is
used in many architures. Certainly, PCIBIOS_SUCCESSFUL indicates success even
more clearly than 0 does.
It is a trivial first step towards a probably significant task. I explained in
the Cover Letter, I can see it didn't get through but I Cc linux-wireless
(properly this time). Probably, too many addresses.
I have resent it. It is here
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-wireless/20200713185559.31967-1-refactormyself@xxxxxxxxx/T/#u
Why is your name inside quotes in your s-o-b?
To keep me company before I get to know my way within the kernel.
I saw people with >2 names do it, so I did! Please let me know if it is odd.
Thank you for the explanations. The cover letter did help.
For both SSB and BMCA changes,
Acked-by: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Larry
