On Wed, Jul 08, 2020 at 08:26:02PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 08, 2020 at 06:16:30PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > I suspect there may be device-specific controls, too, because [1]
> > claims to enable/disable Relaxed Ordering but doesn't touch the
> > PCIe Device Control register. Device-specific controls are
> > certainly allowed, but of course it would be up to the driver, and
> > the device cannot generate TLPs with Relaxed Ordering unless the
> > architected PCIe Enable Relaxed Ordering bit is *also* set.
>
> Yes, at least on RDMA relaxed ordering can be set on a per transaction
> basis and is something userspace can choose to use or not at a fine
> granularity. This is because we have to support historical
> applications that make assumptions that data arrives in certain
> orders.
>
> I've been thinking of doing the same as this patch but for RDMA kernel
> ULPs and just globally turn it on if the PCI CAP is enabled as none of
> our in-kernel uses have the legacy data ordering problem.
If I'm following this correctly - there are two different controls being
discussed here:
1) having the driver request PCI relaxed ordering, which may or may
not be granted, based on other system settings, and
2) having the driver set RO on the transactions it initiates, which
are honored iff the PCI bit is set.
It seems that in addition to the PCI core changes, there still is a need
for driver controls? Unless the driver always enables RO if it's capable?
--
Jonathan
