On Mon, Jul 06, 2020 at 03:16:42PM -0700, Rajat Jain wrote: > On Mon, Jul 6, 2020 at 8:58 AM Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 09:49:37PM -0700, Rajat Jain wrote: > > > +static void pci_enable_acs(struct pci_dev *dev); > > > > I don't think we need this forward declaration, do we? > > We need it unless we move its definition further up in the file: > > drivers/pci/pci.c: In function ‘pci_restore_state’: > drivers/pci/pci.c:1551:2: error: implicit declaration of function > ‘pci_enable_acs’; did you mean ‘pci_enable_ats’? > [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] > 1551 | pci_enable_acs(dev); > > Do you want me to move it up in the file so that we do not need the > forward declaration? Yes, please move it. Maybe a preliminary patch that moves it but doesn't change anything else. I think I thought you had renamed the function, in which case you could tell from the patch itself. But I was mistaken! > > > @@ -4653,7 +4653,7 @@ static int pci_quirk_intel_spt_pch_acs(struct pci_dev *dev, u16 acs_flags) > > > if (!pci_quirk_intel_spt_pch_acs_match(dev)) > > > return -ENOTTY; > > > > > > - pos = pci_find_ext_capability(dev, PCI_EXT_CAP_ID_ACS); > > > + pos = dev->acs_cap; > > > > I assume you verified that all these quirks are FINAL quirks, since > > pci_init_capabilities() is called after HEADER quirks. I'll > > double-check before applying this. > > None of these quirks are applied via DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_*(). All these > quirks are called (directly or indirectly) from either > pci_enable_acs() or pci_acs_enabled(), > > EXCEPT > > pci_idt_bus_quirk(). That one is called from > pci_bus_read_dev_vendor_id() which should be called only after the > parent bridge has been added and setup correctly. > > So it looks all good to me. Great, thanks for checking that.