On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 04:33:53PM -0700, Dave Jiang wrote: > From: Megha Dey <megha.dey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > This is a preparatory patch to introduce Interrupt Message Store (IMS). > > Until now, platform-msi.c provided a generic way to handle non-PCI MSI > interrupts. Platform-msi uses its parent chip's mask/unmask routines > and only provides a way to write the message in the generating device. > > Newly creeping non-PCI complaint MSI-like interrupts (Intel's IMS for > instance) might need to provide a device specific mask and unmask callback > as well, apart from the write function. > > Hence, introduce a new structure platform_msi_ops, which would provide > device specific write function as well as other device specific callbacks > (mask/unmask). > > Signed-off-by: Megha Dey <megha.dey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> As this is not following the Intel-specific rules for sending me new code, I am just deleting it all from my inbox. Please follow the rules you all have been given, they are specific and there for a reason. And in looking at this code, those rules are not going away any time soon. greg k-h
