Re: [patch 19/22] ASoC: Intel: Convert to new X86 CPU match macros

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 3:18 PM Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> The new macro set has a consistent namespace and uses C99 initializers
> instead of the grufty C89 ones.
>
> Get rid the of the local macro wrappers for consistency.

> -#define ICPU(model)    { X86_VENDOR_INTEL, 6, model, X86_FEATURE_ANY, }
> -
>  #define SOC_INTEL_IS_CPU(soc, type)                            \
>  static inline bool soc_intel_is_##soc(void)                    \
>  {                                                              \
>         static const struct x86_cpu_id soc##_cpu_ids[] = {      \
> -               ICPU(type),                                     \
> +               X86_MATCH_INTEL_FAM6_MODEL(type, NULL),         \
>                 {}                                              \
>         };                                                      \
>         const struct x86_cpu_id *id;                            \
> @@ -32,11 +30,11 @@ static inline bool soc_intel_is_##soc(vo
>         return false;                                           \
>  }
>

> +SOC_INTEL_IS_CPU(byt, ATOM_SILVERMONT);
> +SOC_INTEL_IS_CPU(cht, ATOM_AIRMONT);
> +SOC_INTEL_IS_CPU(apl, ATOM_GOLDMONT);
> +SOC_INTEL_IS_CPU(glk, ATOM_GOLDMONT_PLUS);
> +SOC_INTEL_IS_CPU(cml, KABYLAKE_L);

I'm wondering if driver data can be used in one macro to distinguish
which CPU we are run on.
Takashi, what do you think?

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko



[Index of Archives]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux USB]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Greybus]

  Powered by Linux