On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 12:41:08PM +0800, Kai-Heng Feng wrote: > > > > On Mar 11, 2020, at 18:38, Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 01:39:51PM +0800, Kai-Heng Feng wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> I am currently investigating long suspend and resume time of suspend-to-idle. > >> It's because Thunderbolt bridges need to wait for 1100ms [1] for runtime-resume on system suspend, and also for system resume. > >> > >> I made a quick hack to the USB driver and xHCI driver to support direct-complete, but I failed to do so for the parent PCIe bridge as it always disables the direct-complete [2], since device_may_wakeup() returns true for the device: > >> > >> /* Avoid direct_complete to let wakeup_path propagate. */ > >> if (device_may_wakeup(dev) || dev->power.wakeup_path) > >> dev->power.direct_complete = false; > > > > You need to be careful here because otherwise you end up situation where > > the link is not properly trained and we tear down the whole tree of > > devices which is worse than waiting bit more for resume. > > My idea is to direct-complete when there's no PCI or USB device > plugged into the TBT, and use pm_reuqest_resume() in complete() so it > won't block resume() or resume_noirq(). Before doing that.. > >> Once the direct-complete is disabled, system suspend/resume is used hence the delay in [1] is making the resume really slow. > >> So how do we make suspend-to-idle faster? I have some ideas but I am not sure if they are feasible: > >> - Make PM core know the runtime_suspend() already use the same wakeup as suspend(), so it doesn't need to use device_may_wakeup() check to determine direct-complete. > >> - Remove the DPM_FLAG_NEVER_SKIP flag in pcieport driver, and use pm_request_resume() in its complete() callback to prevent blocking the resume process. > >> - Reduce the 1100ms delay. Maybe someone knows the values used in macOS and Windows... > > > > Which system this is? ICL? > > CML-H + Titan Ridge. .. we should really understand this better because CML-H PCH root ports and Titan/Alpine Ridge downstream ports all support active link reporting so instead of the 1000+100ms you should see something like this: 1. Wait for the link + 100ms for the root port 2. Wait for the link + 100ms for the Titan Ridge downstream ports (these are run paraller wrt all Titan Ridge downstream ports that have something connected) If there is a TBT device connected then 2. is repeated for it and so on. So the 1000ms+ is really unexpected. Are you running mainline kernel and if so, can you share dmesg with CONFIG_PCI_DEBUG=y so we can see the delays there? Maybe also add some debugging to pcie_wait_for_link_delay() where it checks for the !pdev->link_active_reporting and waits for 1100ms.