On Thu, Mar 05, 2020 at 09:45:46PM -0800, Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan wrote: > On 3/3/2020 6:36 PM, sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > From: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > As per PCI firmware specification r3.2 System Firmware Intermediary > > (SFI) _OSC and DPC Updates ECR > > (https://members.pcisig.com/wg/PCI-SIG/document/13563), sec titled "DPC > > Event Handling Implementation Note", page 10, Error Disconnect Recover > > (EDR) support allows OS to handle error recovery and clearing Error > > Registers even in FF mode. So create new API pci_aer_raw_clear_status() > > which allows clearing AER registers without FF mode checks. > > > > Signed-off-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > drivers/pci/pci.h | 2 ++ > > drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++---- > > 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.h b/drivers/pci/pci.h > > index e57e78b619f8..c239e6dd2542 100644 > > --- a/drivers/pci/pci.h > > +++ b/drivers/pci/pci.h > > @@ -655,6 +655,7 @@ extern const struct attribute_group aer_stats_attr_group; > > void pci_aer_clear_fatal_status(struct pci_dev *dev); > > void pci_aer_clear_device_status(struct pci_dev *dev); > > int pci_cleanup_aer_error_status_regs(struct pci_dev *dev); > > +int pci_aer_raw_clear_status(struct pci_dev *dev); > > #else > > static inline void pci_no_aer(void) { } > > static inline void pci_aer_init(struct pci_dev *d) { } > > @@ -665,6 +666,7 @@ static inline int pci_cleanup_aer_error_status_regs(struct pci_dev *dev) > > { > > return -EINVAL; > > } > > +int pci_aer_raw_clear_status(struct pci_dev *dev) { return -EINVAL; } > It's missing static specifier. It needs to be fixed. I can fix it in > next version. Bjorn, if there is no need for next version, can you > please make this change? pci_aer_raw_clear_status() is defined in aer.c and called from aer.c and edr.c, so I do not think it can be static. Am I missing something? I have a review/edr branch that I hope becomes what will be applied. Bjorn
