On 25.02.2020 00:33, David Miller wrote: > From: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@xxxxxxxxx> > Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2020 22:20:08 +0100 > >> Few drivers have own definitions for this constant, so move it to the >> PCI core. In addition there are several places where the following >> code sequence is used: >> 1. Read PCI_STATUS >> 2. Mask out non-error bits >> 3. Action based on set error bits >> 4. Write back set error bits to clear them >> >> As this is a repeated pattern, add a helper to the PCI core. >> >> Most affected drivers are network drivers. But as it's about core >> PCI functionality, I suppose the series should go through the PCI >> tree. > > Heiner, something is up with this submission. > > The subject line here says 0/9, but the patches say N/8 and patch #8 never > showed up on the list. > > Sort out what this should be and resubmit, thank you. > Oops, sorry. I'll resubmit.
