On Wed, Feb 05, 2020 at 10:45:24AM +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
> > Ok, this mostly like means we allocate a swiotlb buffer that isn't
> > actually addressable. To verify that can you post the output with the
> > first attached patch? If it shows the overflow message added there,
> > please try if the second patch fixes it.
>
> I'm seeing some sort of busy loop after applying your 1st patch. I sent
> a SysRq to see where it is stuck
And that shows up just with the patch? Really strange as it doesn't
change any blockig points. What also is strange is that I don't see
any of the warnings that should be there. FYI, the slightly updated
version of the patch that went through my testing it here:
git://git.infradead.org/users/hch/misc.git swiotlb-debug
Gitweb:
http://git.infradead.org/users/hch/misc.git/shortlog/refs/heads/swiotlb-debug
this also includes what was the second patch in the previous mail. Can
you try that branch?
