On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 02:51:02PM +0000, Nicholas Johnson wrote:
> Sorry, I was not meant to say you were not interested in getting it as
> good as possible. At the time, you had a goal to achieve (which you did)
> and at that point in time, it would not have been feasible to use
> pci=hpmemsize or similar before my patches were applied:
>
> c13704f5685d ("PCI: Avoid double hpmemsize MMIO window assignment")
> d7b8a217521c ("PCI: Add "pci=hpmmiosize" and "pci=hpmmioprefsize" parameters")
>
> What I was trying to say was not that you were not interested, but more
> that it was not a primary motivation for you at the time. Does this
> sound more accurate? Poor wording on my behalf.
Yes, it does and no worries :-) Just wanted to clarify that one.
